Cabinet Appointments in the Howard Government 1996 – 2007
نویسنده
چکیده
The purpose of this paper is to examine the factors that were associated with cabinet appointment in the Howard Government 1996 – 2007. Broadly, the factors that are cited as important in cabinet appointment in general fall into two categories: the representational and the personal. The representational factors are those that are associated related to an individual’s role as a “representative”. The personal factors are those that are associated with an individual’s personal qualities. Thus, an individual who impresses the selectorate with her oratorical or technical skills may stand a higher chance of being selected than another individual who does not have such skills. In this paper I will demonstrate that the representational factors provide negligible explanation for cabinet appointments in the Howard government. In contrast, the personal factors were significantly more important. In particular, I identify the level of concreteness/abstractness in a parliamentarian’s first speech in parliament as an important factor.
منابع مشابه
Extension of the Portfolio Allocation Model to Surplus Majority Governments: a Theoretically Salient Case Study
Scholars have long studied the conditions under which the cabinet making process will result in minority, surplus majority, or minimum-winning governing coalitions in parliamentary systems. A recent contribution, Laver and Shepsle's portfolio allocation model, argues that surplus majority coalitions can only form when the number of salient policy dimensions in the political system is greater th...
متن کاملCritical Success Factors for the Establishment of e-Government: A Critical Analysis of the Indonesian Cabinet Secretariat's Legal Document Retrieval System (LDRS) Project
This paper outlines an e-government initiative of the Cabinet Secretariat of the Republic of Indonesia, the adoption and implementation of an Electronic Document and Records Management System (EDRMS) called the Legal Document Retrieval System (LDRS). The authors were engaged in the early developmental stage of the project through a special training program involving key personnel of the Cabinet...
متن کاملExtension Of The Portfolio AllocationModel To Surplus Majority Governments: A Fuzzy Approach
Scholars have long studied the conditions under which the cabinet making process will result in minority, surplus majority, or minimum-winning governing coalitions in parliamentary systems. Since Riker, a good number of these attempts have been based on rational choice assumptions. Among formal approaches in this vein, Laver and Shepsles (1996) portfolio allocation model argues that parties ce...
متن کاملThe distribution of individual cabinet positions in coalition governments: A sequential approach
Multiparty government in parliamentary democracies entails bargaining over the payoffs of government participation, in particular the allocation of cabinet positions. While most of the literature deals with the numerical distribution of cabinet seats among government parties, this article explores the distribution of individual portfolios. It argues that coalition negotiations are sequential ch...
متن کاملCabinet and Presidency
Cabinet and presidency represent the two most important and prevalent types of political executive. The structures and functions of political executives have varied widely over time and place, and no single conceptual framework can contain all these variations and their consequences. Although this section is titled “Cabinet and Presidency,” it is often difficult to categorize existing political...
متن کامل